A retarded social transformation

India is believed to be resolutely moving forward as an economic entity. Not even the currently slowing growth takes away from this perception. Added to this is a celebration of the constitution undergirding our democracy. So here, it would seem, is a country forging ahead economically while upholding freedoms for its people. The recent reports of gruesome assaults on women, involving rape and ending with murder, have jolted this narrative. Democracy in India is directly impugned when the accused men allegedly receive protection from the ruling dispensation, as is the case in Uttar Pradesh and Kerala, or when the police force fails to protect women, as was the case in Telengana. In a democracy where the political class preys on identity politics to capture power it is striking that not only is the case of women left scrupulously untouched by parties but also their very existence is increasingly under threat from misogyny in society.

          When a society adopts democracy as its form of governance it presumes the beginning of a social transformation. It is acknowledged that this should entail the elimination of religiously endorsed privileges, the ending of domination by some over others and a general ushering in of equality of opportunity. This process is abetted by economic growth and the emergence of markets, which enable people to shed the encrusted constraints that have held them back. This is a more or less universal trajectory, though it first occurred in western democracies. While this process took a long time it gathered speed after the Second World War when an economic boom unleased emancipation movements, particularly in the United States, which had as their focus black civil rights, feminism and sexual liberation. Why has India not had anything even close, movements that constitute the social transformation that must accompany democracy if the latter is to achieve its ends? This is often answered by recourse to the ‘fatalistic attitude bred by Indian culture’. This we see to be false when we recognise the differentiation whereby not everyone is at the receiving end, most evident in the case of violence against women.

          It is difficult to think of any part of the world where historic inequity has been removed entirely through the agency of the oppressed. Thus the end of the most overt forms of domination of women in the US came after at least half a century of spreading education, which enabled women to imagine a life crafted by themselves. Education further enabled them to be economically independent, sloughing off the patriarchal norm that had bound them for ages. The greater part of the spread of education in the US was through the public school system. By comparison in India very little of the myriad public policy interventions has been directed towards women’s empowerment. Girls stop attending school due to the absence of functioning toilets there and women drop out of the labour force as they do not feel safe when travelling to work. This also restrains economic progress.

          The sanctimonious privileging of religion via ‘Indian secularism’ and a caste-laden discourse has served to keep out a public discussion of the Women’s Question in India. It is not difficult to see that India’s politics as ‘honour among men’ leaves patriarchy secure from challenge. The opposition of caste-based political parties to the Women’s Reservation Bill only reflects this. They have no credible argument whatsoever and rely solely on their numbers in a fractured polity. Affirmative action aimed at a far greater inclusion of women in India’s institutions of governance, especially the police and the judiciary, is central to ending the violence against women. India’s gender-blind political discourse needs disruption.